Known Limitations

Hard stops, workarounds, and fix timelines — review before scoping

ReferencePre-Sales
🚨 Scope Review Required

Review every limitation in this table with the customer before scoping the engagement — not after. Hard-stop limitations (High severity with no workaround) must be resolved before proceeding to a Statement of Work.

Limitation Reference Table

LimitationSeverityWorkaroundFix Timeline
BYOK requirement (AWS) — Some customers require Bring Your Own Key encryption on public cloud. ADO requires AWS and cannot be deployed in private/sovereign environments.HighNone — ADO is an AWS-native service. Customer must be willing to use AWS-hosted ADO or IFP is not suitable.No change planned
AWS dependency — Customers who cannot use AWS (public sector, federal, sovereign cloud) cannot use ADO and therefore cannot use IFP v2.0+.HighNone. This is a hard stop. Do not scope IFP for these customers.No change planned
8-dimension limit on Polaris models — The Polaris engine enforces a hard limit of 8 dimensions per model. Customers with complex dimensional structures may exceed this.HighReduce dimensions to fit within 8. Entity and Time always count. If customer requires >6 additional dimensions, IFP is not suitable.No change planned near term
Top-Down disaggregation not available — Executive targets entered at L2 level cannot be automatically disaggregated to lower levels. Users must manually distribute targets.MediumManual target distribution at each level. Plan extra configuration and training time for this workflow.Planned for future release — no date confirmed
Finance Analyst / CoPlanner pending GA — Embedded but not yet fully released. Functionality is visible in the UX but behavior may change before GA.MediumDo not demo or scope Finance Analyst / CoPlanner features until GA is confirmed. Do not include in SOW scope.GA planned — confirm current status with Apps team
CapEx entity-level only — Capital expense planning is at the entity level only. No employee-level or project-level CapEx planning is supported.MediumUse GL-level OpEx planning for project-level CapEx tracking. Dedicated CE model handles asset-level detail at entity only.No change planned
No employee-level headcount — HC planning is job-role based, not employee-based. Individual employee records require OWP integration.MediumScope OWP alongside IFP for employee-level detail. IFP HC provides job/grade-level planning which satisfies most FP&A use cases.By design — use OWP for employee-level
5 ADO links broken out of box — Five known ADO pipeline links are missing or broken after generation: Vendor Hierarchy (FP), and SYS by J2/J3/J4 Job + Job Grade (HC).MediumCreate these links manually using the ADO manual setup steps in the Configuration Guide. Budget 30–60 minutes for this task during post-generation.Fix expected in future PAF release
Basic allocations only — OpEx allocations support simple percentage-based or amount-based rules. Waterfall and reciprocal allocation methods are not available.LowUse manual workarounds for complex cost allocation. Scope custom development if waterfall or reciprocal allocations are required.No timeline
End-user import templates removed in v2.0 — The Excel-based data entry templates from v1.x are not available in v2.0. All data entry is via the Anaplan UX.LowUse native Anaplan UX for all data entry. For bulk uploads, use ADO-based flat file import pipelines.Not planned for reintroduction
Dependent dropdowns inconsistent in generation — Dependent dropdown UX behavior does not always generate correctly. Pages may show all options rather than filtered options.LowRepair manually after generation by configuring the dropdown filter in the Page Builder. Typically 15–30 minutes per affected page.No fix timeline — manual repair required
Line item codes not in generation — Line item codes must be populated manually after generation. They do not auto-populate from the configuration answers.LowPopulate line item codes from the template model post-generation. Budget time for this in the post-generation checklist.No fix expected near term
Naming mismatches in generation — If entity dimension name in configuration questions doesn't exactly match the hierarchy rename, modules and line items may not rename correctly throughout the model.LowEnsure exact name match (including capitalization) between the question response and hierarchy rename field. Review the generation log for naming errors immediately after generation.By design — requires careful configuration

Exclusion Checklist

Before scoping IFP v2.1, confirm the customer does NOT have any of the following hard stops:

If any box cannot be unchecked, stop and engage the Apps team before proceeding.

Ecosystem Gap Coverage

GapSolutionIntegration Pattern
Employee-level headcountOperational Workforce Planning (OWP)OWP → ADO → IFP HC DAT module
Commercial revenue planningConsensus Margin Planning (CMP)CMP → ADO → IFP Revenue DAT module
Consolidation and statutory reportingFinancial ConsolidationIFP → ADO → Financial Consolidation
Extended workforce budgetingWorkforce Budgeting (WFB)Confirm integration pattern with Apps team